Follow Us Animal Testing Millions of rats, mice, rabbits, dogs, cats, etc. While animal rights activists strongly oppose animal experimentation for the benefit of mankind, medical researchers strongly claim that animal testing has spearheaded the development of various vaccines and drugs. Let's find out more about the pros and cons of animal testing from the articles given below.
Most people agree that animals have at least some moral status — that is why it is wrong to abuse pets or needlessly hurt other animals. This alone represents a shift from a past view where animals had no moral status and treating an animal well was more about maintaining human standards of dignity than respecting any innate rights of the animal.
In modern times, the question has shifted from whether animals have moral status to how much moral status they have and what rights come with that status. The strongest pro animal rights answer to this question would be that non-human animals have exactly the same moral status as humans and are entitled to equal treatment.
The ethicists who endorse this position do not mean that animals are entitled to the very same treatment as humans; arguing that animals should have the right to vote or hold office is clearly absurd. The claim is that animals should be afforded the same level of respectful treatment as humans; in short, we should not have the right to kill animals, force them into our service, or otherwise treat them merely as means to further our own goals.
One common form of this argument claims that moral status comes from the capacity to suffer or to enjoy life. In respect to his capacity, many animals are no different than humans. They can feel pain and experience pleasure. Therefore, they should have the same moral status and deserve equal treatment.
However, we look upon past examples of this behavior as morally condemnable. Being of a particular race or gender does not give one any grounds for declaring outsiders to be of a lower moral status. Many animal rights advocates argue similarly—that just because we are human is not sufficient grounds to declare animals less morally significant.
The first step in making that argument is to show that humans are more important than animals. Below, I will outline one of the more common arguments used to reach this conclusion.
Some philosophers advocate the idea of a moral community. Roughly speaking, this is a group of individuals who all share certain traits in common. By sharing these traits, they belong to a particular moral community and thus take on certain responsibilities toward each other and assume specific rights.
Although a moral community could theoretically include animals, it frequently does not. The human moral community, for instance, is often characterized by a capacity to manipulate abstract concepts and by personal autonomy.
Since most animals do not have the cognitive capabilities of humans and also do not seem to possess full autonomy animals do not rationally choose to pursue specific life goalsthey are not included in the moral community.
Once animals have been excluded from the moral community, humans have only a limited obligation towards them; on this argument, we certainly would not need to grant animals all normal human rights. If animals do not have the same rights as humans, it becomes permissible to use them for research purposes.
Under this view, the ways in which experimentation might harm the animal are less morally significant than the potential human benefits from the research.
One problem with this type of argument is that many humans themselves do not actually fulfill the criteria for belonging to the human moral community.It should be pointed out that no single position regarding this topic exists: some people consider animal testing necessary and unavoidable in the researches and experiments, other part of public state that this animal testing is a cruel expression of species discrimination.
- Experiments on Animals Should Not be Banned (word count includes paper outline) Technology and animal testing have provided the human population with many advancements in the past century.
Every opportunity to embrace these advancements should be used for the betterment of the human population. Over 25 million animals are used for experimentation in the U.S. every year.
Monkeys, rabbits, cats, ferrets, pigs, sheep and chimpanzees are just some of the animals used for biomedical experiments, science education, and product and cosmetics testing.
Animal Testing is Required by the Law. Despite the growing trend in the use of animals for scientific research, there has been a growing debate from different quarters of the American society with one side in support and the other in opposition.
ANIMAL TESTING SHOULD BE BANNED Creatures may be being tortured and killed for the shampoo you use, food you eat, the makeup you may wearing, the cleaner used in your home, or medication you may take. This is not an essay forcing you to believe anything I say, actually I encourage you not to listen to me.
and subjecting animals . Mobiles phones should be banned in schools for both students and teachers. DNA experiments on human embryos are unethical and should not be allowed.
Free example persuasive essay on Animal Experimentation: Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries One of the biggest problems and the main reason why animal experimentation should be banned is the large percentage of birth defects that occur. Barbara F. Ethnical Themes. The Ethics of Animal Experimentation By Stephanie Liou 06 Jul, Animal Research, Research and HD, Research Basics Many medical research institutions make use of non-human animals . Dec 23, · I believe that using animals for cosmetics testing should be banned because of the inhumane way the animals are treated, the results of the tests are often unreliable, and there are other alternatives to using animals as test lausannecongress2018.com: Resolved.
Zoos, aquariums, and circuses violate animal rights and should be shut down. Zoos are internment camps for animals and should be shut down.
University students should not be penalized for.